Sarbanes Oxley Act - Auditing Standard 2

 

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Bylaws and Rules – Standards – AS2

Auditing Standard No. 2: An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction With an Audit of Financial Statements

76. Understanding the Period-end Financial Reporting Process.
 
The period-end financial reporting process includes the following:
 
• The procedures used to enter transaction totals into the general ledger;
 
• The procedures used to initiate, authorize, record, and process journal
entries in the general ledger;
 
• Other procedures used to record recurring and nonrecurring adjustments
to the annual and quarterly financial statements, such as consolidating
adjustments, report combinations, and classifications; and
 
• Procedures for drafting annual and quarterly financial statements and
related disclosures.
 
77. As part of understanding and evaluating the period-end financial reporting
process, the auditor should evaluate:
 
• The inputs, procedures performed, and outputs of the processes the
company uses to produce its annual and quarterly financial statements;
 
• The extent of information technology involvement in each period-end
financial reporting process element;
 
• Who participates from management;
 
• The number of locations involved;
 
• Types of adjusting entries (for example, standard, nonstandard,
eliminating, and consolidating); and
 
• The nature and extent of the oversight of the process by appropriate
parties, including management, the board of directors, and the audit
committee.
 
78. The period-end financial reporting process is always a significant process
because of its importance to financial reporting and to the auditor's opinions on internal
control over financial reporting and the financial statements. The auditor's
understanding of the company's period-end financial reporting process and how it
interrelates with the company's other significant processes assists the auditor in
identifying and testing controls that are the most relevant to financial statement risks.
 
79. Performing Walkthroughs. The auditor should perform at least one walkthrough
for each major class of transactions (as identified in paragraph 71). In a walkthrough,
the auditor traces a transaction from origination through the company's information
systems until it is reflected in the company's financial reports. Walkthroughs provide the
auditor with evidence to:
 
• Confirm the auditor's understanding of the process flow of transactions;
 
• Confirm the auditor's understanding of the design of controls identified for
all five components of internal control over financial reporting, including
those related to the prevention or detection of fraud;
 
• Confirm that the auditor's understanding of the process is complete by
determining whether all points in the process at which misstatements
related to each relevant financial statement assertion that could occur
have been identified;
 
• Evaluate the effectiveness of the design of controls; and
 
• Confirm whether controls have been placed in operation.
 
Note: The auditor can often gain an understanding of the transaction flow,
identify and understand controls, and conduct the walkthrough simultaneously.
 
80. The auditor's walkthroughs should encompass the entire process of initiating,
authorizing, recording, processing, and reporting individual transactions and controls for
each of the significant processes identified, including controls intended to address the
risk of fraud.
 
During the walkthrough, at each point at which important processing
procedures or controls occur, the auditor should question the company's personnel
about their understanding of what is required by the company's prescribed procedures
and controls and determine whether the processing procedures are performed as
originally understood and on a timely basis. (Controls might not be performed regularly
but still be timely.) During the walkthrough, the auditor should be alert for exceptions to
the company's prescribed procedures and controls.
 
81. While performing a walkthrough, the auditor should evaluate the quality of the
evidence obtained and perform walkthrough procedures that produce a level of
evidence consistent with the objectives listed in paragraph 79. Rather than reviewing
copies of documents and making inquiries of a single person at the company, the
auditor should follow the process flow of actual transactions using the same documents
and information technology that company personnel use and make inquiries of relevant
personnel involved in significant aspects of the process or controls.
 
To corroborate information at various points in the walkthrough, the auditor might ask
personnel to describe their understanding of the previous and succeeding processing or control
activities and to demonstrate what they do. In addition, inquiries should include followup
questions that could help identify the abuse of controls or indicators of fraud.
 
Examples of follow-up inquiries include asking personnel:
 
• What they do when they find an error or what they are looking for to
determine if there is an error (rather than simply asking them if they
perform listed procedures and controls); what kind of errors they have
found; what happened as a result of finding the errors, and how the errors
were resolved. If the person being interviewed has never found an error,
the auditor should evaluate whether that situation is due to good
preventive controls or whether the individual performing the control lacks
the necessary skills.
 
• Whether they have ever been asked to override the process or controls,
and if so, to describe the situation, why it occurred, and what happened.
 
82. During the period under audit, when there have been significant changes in the
process flow of transactions, including the supporting computer applications, the auditor
should evaluate the nature of the change(s) and the effect on related accounts to
determine whether to walk through transactions that were processed both before and
after the change.
 
Note: Unless significant changes in the process flow of transactions, including
the supporting computer applications, make it more efficient for the auditor to
prepare new documentation of a walkthrough, the auditor may carry his or her
documentation forward each year, after updating it for any changes that have
taken place.

 

Become a Certified Sarbanes-Oxley Expert (CSOE)
Visit www.sarbanes-oxley-association.com/Distance_Learning_and_Certification.htm
 
   

 

 

 

© Sarbanes Oxley Compliance Professionals Association (SOXCPA)

Certified Sarbanes-Oxley Expert (CSOE) - Distance learning and online certification program